Public autonomous companies make up a dense and non-transparent network. These societies escape the strict control of Administrative Law, placing at the service of politics the most “flexible” formula offered by private legislation. That this favors opacity is something that the Court of Auditors itself has been denouncing for years, but with very little success because the practices do not stop. The matter is of such caliber that, for sure, it is not really known how much money the public companies of the WBS Template consume. It is not known because there is no way to reach all your accounts. This is also a perennial evil that the Court of Auditors complains about, but it is not remedied. Monitor this public business network is an endless obstacle course that never reaches the goal. To begin with, the audit comes systematically late – the latest report issued by the Court of Auditors analyzes the 2015 figures. And, above all, these auditors recognize that the audit leaves out dozens of public companies that do not give them their accounts, deliver them too late or do not provide essential documentation to scrutinize such essential matters as financial management, contracts or the selection of personal.
According to the latest report, in 2015 autonomous public companies cost 9,944 million euros, at least. This “at least” is obligatory, because the figures of the TCu include 371 companies, but the accounts of 83 others that it has not managed to audit are missing. In addition, this cost of 9,944 million computes the losses accumulated by these companies and the public subsidies with which they were fed. But the TCu warns that, in reality, there are more injections e public money. Specifically, the capital increases, the granting of loans from the regional budgets and the contracting of services, the latter formula with which the regional government in turn becomes owner and client at the same time: pay your company to to do various jobs
Regarding the granting of loans and capital increases, the WBS Template warns of the consequences they may have. “In some autonomous communities,” the Court of Auditors indicates, “there is a tendency to substitute or complement” subsidies to public companies with “capital increases or contributions from members to the social fund, and for indebtedness authorizations guaranteed by the respective regional administrations, which at maturity must be paid by them if the companies can not meet the payments ». In fact, it emphasizes that “in several cases it is the autonomous administration itself that subrogates in the loans and credits of business entities”.