“I wanted to be accountable to the public, and I can not tell you whether any of the informal statements in the informal documents are referred to by anyone whose name is based on which informal statements have begun to proceed and they did not repeat them before the judge.When the reconstruction of the case file DORH will make a decision” , Jelenić said, claiming that there was no overcrowding in 2011. Asked if Milijan Brkić would be called to give a statement, Jelenić responded: “Everybody who needs to give a statement will be invited,” he said. Asked if the investigation was stopped at that moment or continued with some other actions, Jelenić said: “To answer that question we will try to reconstruct the case file. Because the case file at the moment is not in the Municipal State Attorney’s Office. The Municipal State Attorney’s Office will make its decision after the reconstruction of the case “, he announced. He added that the May 2019 Calendar UK at the higher state attorneys, the County and DORH, found that the State Attorney’s Office never had these two superiors reported on the existence of the case. “By me, the system works satisfactorily. Of course, there are bugs in each crop, but this system is capable of recognizing the badge and then when it becomes the basis of doubt and the evidence against it, the indictment is raised”, Jelenić said. no Vice President of Ranko Ostojić said after the session that the Board of Top Authorities requested the submission of official reports after the actions taken.
May 2019 Calendar UK
“I have to express my pleasure that all parts of the security system, including non-mandatory, such as the independent judicial body, the State Attorney’s Office, who did not have the obligation to come to parliament, were at the session and provided useful information. precise answers, “Ostojić said. Why did not find out who compromised an investigation in the case of elite prostitution in 2011 and whether Milijan Brkic gave official information to people who were under secret surveillance – the State Attorney’s Office has not responded to that question for two days.
May Calendar UK
At the request of Dnevnik Nova TV, they have just said that they are still trying to verify. The Zagreb State Attorney’s Office announced that the case file mentioning Milijan Brkić did not disappear in the Croatian State Attorney’s Office because he never was in it. As stated in the statement, the file was never in the DORH or DORH acted in the case. The statement states that the requested copies of the case of the Zagreb County Court were requested and that the case file would be renewed.
We transmit the communication of the Municipal State Attorney’s Office in Zagreb in its entirety. “On May 2019 Calendar UK , the Municipal State Attorney at the Zagreb State Attorney’s Office issued a decision on the renewal of the case file pursuant to Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the State Attorney’s Office on the basis of data from registers and supplementary books and obtaining documentation found at the courts, parties or other bodies.